Pease Read the direction carefully before you take this assignment:
* From 1 to 3 I need it in 30 hours
* 4 I need in 4 days.
1) Read chapter 8
2) Then go to this website and choose one of the people on the list and argue that he/she should be the “most influential” or #1 on the list.
2016 Times 100 Most Influential List. (http://time.com/collection/2016-time-100/)
3) Answer these 5 questions:
A. Which of the top 100 influential people did you choose?
B. Why did you pick him or her? (This conversation will be good for the introduction.
C. Provide a list of criteria you will use.
D. Provide a few others in his/her field you will use as comparison (see Krauthammer’s commentary from the text.)
E. Write Introduction: your introduction should be a little conversation about why you choose the person you did. Of course, you will emphasize his/her significance to all of us now and in the future in your conclusion, but you need to introduce his/her influence in the introduction. Finally, you will close your introduction with your claim.
All the Above I need it in 30 hours All the Above I need it in 30 hours
All the Above I need it in 30 hours All the Above I need it in 30 hours
NEXT: NEXT NEXT NEXT
4) Write the full essay 1,200 words (I need it in 4 DAYS)
You must set criterial and support your choice. Also pay particular attention to Charles Krauthammer’s Method 1 and Method 2 for doing an evaluation on a person (as explained in chapter 8.)
Once you have set your criteria, you will need to prove to us how the person you have chosen fits that criteria. Of course, you must provide research — examples, others’ testimony, whatever you can find to prove that the person you chosen should be #1.
Specific Essay Requirements:
- 4 different sources, one of which must come from a database.
- Around 1,200 word minimum
- Works Cited page
Before you make your final revisions of this essay, make sure you have studied carefully all the tips and directions i
Take the time to review the following areas that have been problematic in the prior essay:
- Have you used the correct MLA heading?
- Did you create a title — not just the topic (See the document I added to help you)?
- Is your introduction effective (Have you reviewed my feedback on the draft introduction you submitted?)
- Have you carefully revised your essay — not just turned in your first thoughts/first draft?
- Have you reviewed your past graded essay so that you do not make the same mistakes again?
- Have you reviewed the rubric to make sure you have addressed all the necessary components?
- Is your conclusion actually a conclusion and not just a re-hashing of what you have already said in the paper. Have you ended by addressing why what you have said in the paper is important to society — to our future?
- Is your Works Cited page done in MLA format?
Evaluation Rubric
|
Evaluation Rubric |
|||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction paragraph that uses a “technique” and offers a strong claim. |
20.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Body — develops the evaluation using specific criteria. Points are organized by importance |
80.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paragraph development — strong topic sentences, example sentences, effective summary sentences |
40.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Adherence to formal grammar rules |
20.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion paragraph — addresses significance |
20.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Correct MLA formatting |
10.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Word Choice — strong verbs, avoids repetition, slang, dull vocabulary |
20.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Research technique — Works Cited page and in-text citations done correctly. |
40.0 pts |
||
|
Total Points: 250.0 |
|||
